top of page

 

The Emperor Of Ice-Cream

 

Call the roller of big cigars,

The muscular one, and bid him whip

In kitchen cups concupiscent curds.

Let the wenches dawdle in such dress

As they are used to wear, and let the boys

Bring flowers in last month's newspapers.

Let be be finale of seem.

The only emperor is the emperor of ice-cream.

 

Take from the dresser of deal.

Lacking the three glass knobs, that sheet

On which she embroidered fantails once

And spread it so as to cover her face.

If her horny feet protrude, they come

To show how cold she is, and dumb.

Let the lamp affix its beam.

The only emperor is the emperor of ice-cream.

 

Wallace Stevens

I'm a title

Dear, Though the Night Is Gone

By Wystan Hugh Auden

 

Dear, though the night is gone,

Its dream still haunts today,

That brought us to a room

Cavernous, lofty as

A railway terminus,

And crowded in that gloom

Were beds, and we in one

In a far corner lay.

 

Our whisper woke no clocks,

We kissed and I was glad

At everything you did,

Indifferent to those

Who sat with hostile eyes

In pairs on every bed,

Arms round each other's neck,

Inert and vaguely sad.

 

O but what worm of guilt

Or what malignant doubt

Am I the victim of,

That you then, unabashed,

Did what I never wished,

Confessed another love;

And I, submissive, felt

Unwanted and went out?

As we have seen, love and death are constants of human experience. Literature, however, always has the power to subvert our sometimes conventional attitudes and ideas.

 

Here are two more poems, one about love and one about death, to further challenge us.

 

The passage of prose afterwards deals with both topics simultaneously.

First, a poem by W.H. Auden about love.

"Dear, though the Night is Gone" by WH Auden could be given to a senior class with the question, "Why might some readers find this love poem disturbing?"

 

I would suggest deliberately asking pupils to form same-sex pairs as they work on the poem and I would also suggest that the teacher does not reveal Auden's homosexuality until later. Auden's work was first read without most of his audience being aware of his homosexuality, and one could debate later whether such contextual knowledge is important and how it might or might not affect the ways we read and appreciate this poem.

 

It would be interesting in discussion to bring out and discuss the different responses of male pairs and female pairs in the class, and the assumptions about love which such pairings made.

 

Below is an essay I wrote, having set the class at a later stage, after discussion, to write a critical appreciation of it.

 

Dear, though the Night is Gone  Critical Essay

 

Dear, though… is a love poem, addressed by the poet to his or her lover. Rather surrealistically, it describes an occasion when at night they came to an enormous room ("Cavernous, lofty…") where they lay together, kissing, surrounded by other "pairs", who watched them with "hostile eyes". The poet then reproaches the lover, who the following morning confessed another love, making the poet feel "Unwanted" and causing him or her to leave. I say "him or her" because one of the oddities of this poem is that there is a certain ambiguity about the gender of all those concerned.

 

The most striking contrast in the poem is that between the rapturous language and the sordidness of the surroundings. The first two lines suggest a conventional love poem with words like "Dear", "night" and "dream". Even the word "cavernous" has romantic associations. It is the simile, however, which brings us up sharply; "lofty as A railway terminus" suggests not only urban impersonality but also something rather final: a terminus is the end of a journey and it foreshadows, perhaps, the end of their romance. "Crowded", "gloom" linked with "beds" hints at something very institutional, like a prison, or a hospital or a hostel, even, for down-and-outs.

 

The exact details of the surroundings are left vague. Who are these couples on other beds? Why are they "Inert and vaguely sad"? Why are they hostile to the two lovers? We are not even sure of the sex either of the lovers or of the surrounding couples in this strange and almost nightmarish setting.

 

Yet there is a rapture to their love, or to the poet's experience of their loving, which is accentuated in simple but effective language:

 

"Our whisper woke no clocks".

 

This is an odd phrase, as if there was a certain timelessness to their love-making (hinted at in "glad At everything you did"). The fact that they are carrying on under the eyes of others is very odd and disturbing. It is as though they are determined to create their own world of love in defiance of the loveless world about them. The other couples seem envious of their union, which seems at first to be so complete (they are "Indifferent to everybody else").

 

It is in the third stanza that pathos enters with the confession by the lover, which drives them apart. The lover, shamelessly, "unabashed", appears almost deliberately cruel, or at least insensitive, and the poet, "submissive", feels rejected and alone. It is almost as if they are now on the same level as the other pairs, who seem similarly depressed and lonely. One problem in the poem is why the persona feels a "victim" of the "worm of guilt" or the "malignant doubt" and what this refers to. Does the poet feel guilty, and if so, why, for it is the lover, surely, who is guilty of loving someone else?

 

The poem is quite tightly organised, like a conventional love lyric. The trimeter rhythm has the simplicity of a ballad; the rhyme scheme is complex and regular, though the rhymes themselves are more often near-rhymes, which introduces a rather inharmonious note, though "doubt " and "out", as rhymes, conclude the poem effectively and with a sense of finality.

 

In conclusion, then, the theme and style of rapturous love turning to hopeless disappointment, which is common enough, is here given a modern and disturbing setting. The world seems to be nomadic and institutionalised – full of loneliness, even though "crowded". The circumstances of this love affair are not given exactly, but it seems momentary and set in a bleak world where everybody is paired off, but nobody is happy. It seems to be, literally, a one-night stand, which the poet celebrates for both its rapture and its desolation. The modern, urban setting contrasts oddly and disturbingly with the conventional lyricism of the language and its organisation.

13 EROS & THANATOS

 

More training in reading closely...

Here now is another poem, this time about death. It's by Wallace Stevens and pupils unaided usually find this very difficult to think about it, but I've always found this a beautiful and fascinating poem.

 

 

 

 

A  first reading of the poem is likely to be full of confusion and questions. Who is the "roller of big cigars"? What is happening? Why ice cream? Newspapers? Who is this emperor? What is going on?

 

It is only in the second stanza that we are given clues, which allow us to work backwards and make some sense of what has happened. A woman has died. A sheet covers her face and she is "dumb". She is also poor. "Deal" is a cheap wood and one of the drawers is lacking a knob.

 

In fact, poverty is hinted at throughout the poem. The people referred to are eating out of "kitchen cups;, servant girls, "wenches", are being encouraged not to dress up; boys are bringing flowers in "last month's newspapers" rather than special wrapping paper. It may be an awkward jump to make, but what if this is a wake, a celebration party to honour a servant who has died?

 

Now we might understand that the roller of big cigars could be a butler of sorts. Luxuries are on offer, but we also notice that there is a sort of squalor about the proceedings. It's a holiday, "dawdle", but nobody is dressing up or perhaps able to honour the woman with any real finery.

 

"Concupiscent curds" is a startling phrase, suggesting an almost sexual sense of extravagance and pleasure in the ice cream, which is being served up in such a downbeat way "kitchen cups", no glass bowls.

 

And what I find startling is the degree of weary, sad resignation behind "Let be be finale of seem". Death has brought home a reality. There can be no "seeming" now. The only reassurance or pleasure left in life is "ice cream", perhaps a rare luxury here. God is here relegated to an "emperor of ice cream".

 

This is "carpe diem" with a vengeance. There is disillusionment and finality about the tone of voice instructing someone to "Take…. that sheet…". That the woman embroidered "fantails" on her sheet is evidence that she tried to embellish her poor life. Her feet are "horny", suggesting that she rarely even wore shoes.

 

As this is America, we might guess these servants to be workers on a big southern estate perhaps: Afro-Americans or poor immigrants, the poem is unspecific.

 

There are lots of commands in the poem and an attempt to alleviate the darkness and lonely finality of death, but in the end the lamp will "affix its beam" (perhaps the light of those sitting up watching with the body) showing that there is no future happiness or heaven to look forward to. There is just the pleasure symbolised by ice cream, which will always be controlled by an "emperor". The world is dark and unfair. Take what pleasures you can, even if they are only wheeled out at the time of somebody's death.

 

This is what the poem seems to me to be saying. This is a hard poem for students, and Wallace Stevens' poems are sometimes difficult to make immediate sense of, but there is a beautiful sense of control in this particular poem. The rhythms are not harsh, the patterning suggests a disciplined response to grief and celebration. There is a lot of power to the pathos in this work. What do the pupils make of it? Are they convinced by this "reading" or do they have an alternative idea of what is going on?

 

 

The next piece is an extract of prose, taken from a novel,  "The Loved One" by Evelyn Waugh. 

It would be interesting to see just how much pupils can glean from this without help, using clues from the passage.

 

Questioning might go like this, asking for evidence as you go:

 

Where is it set?

Why is cricket mentioned?

Who has died? How?

How upset is Dennis Barlow? (his friend?)

Why is he not more upset?

Who is Aimée?

What does she do?

Who is Dr Kenworthy?

What is his judgement of the "trophy"? (Why?)

Is Dennis in love with Aimée?

What sort of name is Aimée Thantogenos?

How does she respond to him?

How are we to read the sentence, "Dennis thought of the waxwork of Marat in his bath."

How are we being encouraged (through Dennis's point of view) to respond to this place?

What is fake and what is real about what is going on?

What does the comment "the painter at the private view" suggest?

How seriously should we take this piece of writing?

What do we make of Dennis Barlow as the character we are given most access to?

Does the narration have a tone of voice?How objective is it?

Is love here more important than death?

 

Let's fill it in somewhat more. Dennis, an Englishman working in Hollywood, found Sir Francis, an Englishman also working out in California (leading a stereotyped life of "the English abroad", where they have their cricket clubs and formalities) swinging from a noose, having committed suicide.

 

He has fallen for the charms of the very straightforward Aimée, who works as a beautician in the mortuary.

 

She, but not Dennis, seems to be immune to the ghastly artificiality of Whispering Glades. She also does not seem to be aware of his attentions. "Thus in a thousand novels had lovers stood" seems also fake. The reversed syntax seems artificial as if Dennis is aware that his "love" is about as corny as it can get.

 

We are given Dennis's point of view, but we suspect that his cynicism (?) or his amusement (?) is not entirely free from censure. Is he playing with Aimée? Does he have no real feelings (other than disgust) at his friend's/relative's? death?

 

What was the "sudden emotion"? Surely not laughter? What are the jokes going on about "American dwellings" (American fixation on air conditioning?)

 

Is there anything we can take seriously in this passage?

 

And this question, if you are setting this passage cold, to be discussed in small groups, could be what you start them off with, along with some of the other questions, if they get stuck.

Extract from 'The Loved One' by Evelyn Waugh

 

The funeral was fixed for Thursday; Wednesday afternoon was the time for leave-taking in the Slumber Room. That morning Dennis called at Whispering Glades to see that everything was in order.

 

He was shown straight to the Orchid Room. Flowers had arrived in great quantities, mostly from the shop below, mostly in their 'natural beauty'. (after consultation the Cricket Club's fine trophy in the shape of cross bats and wickets had been admitted. Dr Kenworthy had himself given judgement; the trophy was essentially a reminder of life, not of death; that was the crux.) The anti-room was so full of flowers that there seemed no other furniture or decoration; double doors led to the Slumber Room. Dennis hesitated with his fingers on the handle and was aware of communication with another hand beyond the panels. Thus in a hundred novels had lovers stood. The door opened and Aimée Thanatogenos stood quite close to him; behind her more, many more flowers and all about her a rich hot-house scent and the low voices of a choir discoursing sacred music from the cornice. At the moment of their meeting a treble voice broke out with poignant sweetness: "Oh for the Wings of a Dove."

 

No breath stirred the enchanted stillness of the two rooms. The leaded casements were screwed tight. The air came like the boy's voice from far away, sterilised and transmuted. The temperature was slightly cooler than is usual in American dwellings. The rooms seemed isolated and unnaturally quiet, like a railways coach that has stopped in the night far from any station.

 

"Come in Mr. Barlow."

 

Aimée stood aside and now Dennis saw that the centre of the room was filled with a great cumulus of flowers. Dennis was too young ever to have seen an Edwardian conservatory in full rig but he knew the literature of the period and in his imagination had seen such a picture; it was all there, even the gilt chairs disposed in pairs as though for some starched and jewelled courtship.

 

There was no catafalque. The coffin stood a few inches from the carpet on a base that was hidden in floral enrichments. Half the lid was open. Sir Francis was visible form the waist up. Dennis thought of the waxwork of Marat in his bath. The shroud had been made to fit admirably. There was a fresh gardenia in the buttonhole and another between the fingers. The hair was snow-white and parted in a straight line from brow to crown revealing the scalp below, colourless and smooth, as though the skin had rolled away and the enduring skull already lay exposed. The gold rim of the monocle framed a delicately tinted eyelid. The complete stillness was more startling than any violent action. The body looked altogether smaller than life-size now that it was, as it were, stripped of the thick pelt of mobility and intelligence. And the face which inclined its blind eyes towards him – the face was entirely horrible; as ageless as a tortoise and as inhuman; a painted and smirking obscene travesty by comparison with which the devil-mask Dennis had found in the noose was a festive adornment, a thing an uncle might don at a Christmas party.

 

Aimée stood beside her handiwork – the painter at the private view – and heard Dennis draw his breath in sudden emotion.

 

"Is it what you hoped?" she asked.

 

"More" – and then – "Is he quite hard?"

 

"Firm." "May I touch him?"

 

"Please not. It leaves a mark." "Very well."

 

Then, in accordance with the etiquette of the place, she left him to his reflections.

bottom of page